<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch that space! (more from TCUK09)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2009/09/watch-that-space-more-from-tcuk09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2009/09/watch-that-space-more-from-tcuk09/</link>
	<description>on technical writing, content strategy, information design, and all the whitespace in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lewis Baxley Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2009/09/watch-that-space-more-from-tcuk09/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lewis Baxley Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farbey.co.uk/?p=319#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Interesting article! I really don&#039;t think any of us, even the most evangelical of structured writing believers, ever have thought format doesn&#039;t matter at all. I do think we exaggerate its lower priority to get the bigger point across which is writers often rely on nice formatting to &quot;balance,&quot; if you will, not-so-nice writing. To me, your article and the presentation on which it focuses reveals important truths; better said, it reminds us that aesthetics always matter to human beings. I just wish more tech writers could understand (would understand?) that the best aesthetics they can &quot;do&quot; have more to do with being concise and thorough in conveying meaning through words themselves than the way they appear on a screen or a page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article! I really don&#8217;t think any of us, even the most evangelical of structured writing believers, ever have thought format doesn&#8217;t matter at all. I do think we exaggerate its lower priority to get the bigger point across which is writers often rely on nice formatting to &#8220;balance,&#8221; if you will, not-so-nice writing. To me, your article and the presentation on which it focuses reveals important truths; better said, it reminds us that aesthetics always matter to human beings. I just wish more tech writers could understand (would understand?) that the best aesthetics they can &#8220;do&#8221; have more to do with being concise and thorough in conveying meaning through words themselves than the way they appear on a screen or a page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2009/09/watch-that-space-more-from-tcuk09/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farbey.co.uk/?p=319#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Interesting comment Kai - thanks.  The UA Europe conference was a great success, but I think we&#039;ll definitely have to encourage more blogging and tweeting at next year&#039;s event.  As a first step towards this, we have now created a Twitter account for UA Europe (http://twitter.com/ua_europe) and are publishing a hashtag of #ua_europe for tweets about the conference.  Any comments from anyone who attended this year&#039;s UA Europe conference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comment Kai &#8211; thanks.  The UA Europe conference was a great success, but I think we&#8217;ll definitely have to encourage more blogging and tweeting at next year&#8217;s event.  As a first step towards this, we have now created a Twitter account for UA Europe (<a href="http://twitter.com/ua_europe" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/ua_europe</a>) and are publishing a hashtag of #ua_europe for tweets about the conference.  Any comments from anyone who attended this year&#8217;s UA Europe conference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2009/09/watch-that-space-more-from-tcuk09/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farbey.co.uk/?p=319#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your extensive and informative posts and tweets from TCUK09 - they are most helpful to take the pulse and temperature of our industry for those of us who couldn&#039;t attend!

I was wondering if you had heard anything about the UA Europe conference that took place a week before in Cardiff? It seems this event was covered much less than TCUK, at least among tech writers, and I wondered why that might have been...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your extensive and informative posts and tweets from TCUK09 &#8211; they are most helpful to take the pulse and temperature of our industry for those of us who couldn&#8217;t attend!</p>
<p>I was wondering if you had heard anything about the UA Europe conference that took place a week before in Cardiff? It seems this event was covered much less than TCUK, at least among tech writers, and I wondered why that might have been&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Wenger</title>
		<link>http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2009/09/watch-that-space-more-from-tcuk09/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Wenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farbey.co.uk/?p=319#comment-276</guid>
		<description>David, your third bullet point is key: &quot;Is it possible that one day a syntactic spacing technology such as Readsmart will be integrated into a structured authoring tool?&quot; The technical communication profession will only embrace syntactic spacing if it&#039;s consistent with other technology that allows content to be repurposed without writers hand-crafting the output. Otherwise, I don&#039;t see how a cost-benefit analysis would favor the use of this technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, your third bullet point is key: &#8220;Is it possible that one day a syntactic spacing technology such as Readsmart will be integrated into a structured authoring tool?&#8221; The technical communication profession will only embrace syntactic spacing if it&#8217;s consistent with other technology that allows content to be repurposed without writers hand-crafting the output. Otherwise, I don&#8217;t see how a cost-benefit analysis would favor the use of this technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

