Meetings of the London Business Book Club, organised by the irrepressible Catherine Crawley, continue to offer fascinating speakers and stimulating discussions in a warm and cosy atmosphere. Last week we had the great pleasure of hearing from Jonathan Salem Baskin, whose provocatively titled Branding Only Works on Cattle has ruffled a few feathers in the marketing world.
I was very impressed by Jonathan, not just because he told me that user documentation created by technical writers is an undervalued part of corporate identity, or because he promised to promote my latest user documentation survey, but because he presents his ideas in such a pleasant and convincing way. Rather than lecturing his audience, he asked deceptively simple questions which led to some intriguing discussions. What would the world look like without branding, and without all the advertising spend that goes along with it? What criteria would consumers use to decide between products from different manufacturers? Do “brand values” actually influence consumer spending habits?
People who work in marketing and advertising often claim that brands do make a difference to consumer habits, and often claim that otherwise unexplained revenues are the result of branding. Baskin himself used to be a senior marketing executive for some household name companies, and probably made some of those claims. But he now has his doubts about the whole “brand value” argument, suggesting in his book and in his blog that consumer decisions are based on functional values, not just on the emotional values that brand marketers want to associate with their goods. Particularly now, in a time of economic recession, says Baskin, consumers are choosing the most suitable product at the most suitable price, and ignoring more expensive goods despite their “exciting” brands.
For many people in the marketing world, this is crazy talk. If it were true, it would mean that the whole model of brand marketing was broken, and they would need to think of completely new strategies. Like making stuff that people would want to buy because it was actually good. Now that would never do!
Top 10 TechComm Influencers 2011
Most Influential Tech Comm Bloggers 2010
Pages
Blogroll
- 2moroDocs
- A Techie Tech Writer
- Communication Cloud
- Conradiator
- CyberText Newsletter
- DITA XML org
- ffeathers
- Firehead Blog
- Gryphon Mountain
- I Heart Tech Docs
- I'd rather be writing
- Just Write Click
- Less Work, More Flow
- Mardahl.dk
- Michael Priestley
- One man writes
- Palimpsest
- RJ Jacquez
- RoboColum(n)
- Talks like a scientist
- techcommdood
- The Agile Technical Writer
- The Content Wrangler
- UAX (User Assistance)
Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- July 2006
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005

p>






In the Victorian era, the populace suffered greatly from adulterated foodstuffs, dodgy medications and other packaged and bottled goods, sold without brands. The innovation at that time of branding and trade marks was a way in which trusted manufacturers such as Bass & Co, Pears, Reckitt & Colman could build up a loyal following; the adverts might urge the consumer to ‘accept no substitute’ – and it made sense.
I think this *can* still work today. As a user of technical equipment, I trust brands like Nikon or Sony because I’ve always had good reliable performance from their products.
Where branding and rebranding is a nonsense, however, is when it is like putting lipstick on a pig.