<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading by numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/reading-by-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/reading-by-numbers/</link>
	<description>on technical writing, content strategy, information design, and all the whitespace in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lois Wakeman</title>
		<link>http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/reading-by-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Lois Wakeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farbey.co.uk/index.php/2008/03/reading-by-numbers/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>David - this is analogous to the arguments used against automated web accessibility testing tools (like Bobby and Cynthia Says). They come up with raw data that needs intelligent interpretation to be of any use, rather than being ready &quot;out of the box&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, I suspect the conclusions about usefulness are pretty accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; this is analogous to the arguments used against automated web accessibility testing tools (like Bobby and Cynthia Says). They come up with raw data that needs intelligent interpretation to be of any use, rather than being ready &#8220;out of the box&#8221;.</p>
<p>So, I suspect the conclusions about usefulness are pretty accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

